Serenade |
-- By Tom Phillips
Three years ago, mad as hell about New York City Ballet’s plan to triple and quadruple ticket prices, I and a few other balletomanes declared an audience strike against our long-time beloved ballet company. We hoped a boycott would shake up the management, and force a return to popular prices.
Three years ago, mad as hell about New York City Ballet’s plan to triple and quadruple ticket prices, I and a few other balletomanes declared an audience strike against our long-time beloved ballet company. We hoped a boycott would shake up the management, and force a return to popular prices.
Three years
later, they win. Drawn by rave reviews
and gorgeous pictures in the paper, I finally slunk back across my invisible picket
line yesterday. I paid 62 dollars for a seat in Row G on the side in the
fourth ring – three times what I would have paid just a few years ago. The reward was a brilliant triple bill of
Balanchine classics – Serenade, Agon, and Symphony in C – from a company
dancing better than it has in years. Is
this the effect of prosperity? If so,
you can’t argue with success.
Established
stars and up-and-comers were all dancing with passion and precision, and the
corps looked like they cared. There were no more cases of arrested
development among the divas – all looked like they had matured in the last
three years. In the first-movement
allegro of Symphony in C, Ashley Bouder was crystalline without being affected,
and her partner Andrew Veyette’s solo was crisp and strong. But they may have been topped by the bounding grace of a young couple, Lauren Lovette with Joseph Gordon, in the
third movement allegro.
Savannah
Lowery attacked Agon with assurance and agility. And Adrian Danchig-Waring looked like a danseur noble.
Still it was my prima ballerina, Sara Mearns, who brought me to tears in Serenade. Mearns has internalized both Tchaikovsky’s music and Balanchine’s technique to the point where they are expressions of herself. One movement brought a gasp as never before – a sudden, violent horizontal whirl in the arms of her would-be rescuer, just before he’s led away. It seemed to augur increased beauty and mastery before the inevitable, early end of a ballerina’s whirl on the stage.
Still it was my prima ballerina, Sara Mearns, who brought me to tears in Serenade. Mearns has internalized both Tchaikovsky’s music and Balanchine’s technique to the point where they are expressions of herself. One movement brought a gasp as never before – a sudden, violent horizontal whirl in the arms of her would-be rescuer, just before he’s led away. It seemed to augur increased beauty and mastery before the inevitable, early end of a ballerina’s whirl on the stage.
Even the
orchestra, under the feisty Clotilde Otranto, seemed engaged and free of the
hiccups of past years.
NYCB’s packaging
and advertising is cheesy – slick photos of dancers sprawled on sheets, sparkly
fake jewels on the new costumes for Symphony in C, a fluffy art exhibit in the
promenade. But what counts is the
product, and the product is on a roll.
NYCB even has a hot young resident choreographer, Justin Peck, turning
out new works people want to see.
So it’s time to wake up, old man,
and admit you’re on the wrong side of history.
I shouldn’t have directed all my
spleen at New York City Ballet. They’re just
doing what all of Lincoln Center
is doing, indeed most of Manhattan
and even parts of Brooklyn and Queens
– going upscale, in a hurry. Middle-class Manhattan is going to hell in a Gucci handbag. Poor students and scruffy
intellectuals have gone the way of the corner deli, now the corner branch of
Citibank or Chase. The new audience,
everywhere, is more expensively dressed, many from out of town. New York City Ballet was right – it can fill the theater at premium prices, with an audience of upscale New Yorkers and
moneyed tourists. In the fourth ring, I
sat next to a Chinese lady in a fur coat.
What’s the downside? Just the shrinking of the audience pool. Balanchine and Lincoln Kirstein wanted to
make ballet an American art form, and an essential part of their scheme was to
invite everyone in to see the ballet, at prices anyone could afford. It worked.
Generations of dancers – as well as writers and critics – were spawned
amid the creative energy and democratic openness of the fifties, sixties and
seventies.
That was then. Balanchine and Kirstein’s vision has faded, following
Fiorello LaGuardia’s dream of opera for the masses. New York City Opera is defunct. The New York State Theater is now the
David H. Koch Theater. Inclusiveness is
out.
Will I ever be a regular patron of
New York City Ballet again? Not at these
prices. But I don’t want to miss the
rise of Lauren Lovette, or the apotheosis of Sara Mearns, or the next big thing
from Justin Peck. Balletomania is
incurable. Heart and spleen, I’ll hang
around.
-- Copyright 2015 by Tom Phillips
No comments:
Post a Comment